Hi, On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > If you see the automatic comment about that a fix was committed and you > are not longer able to reproduce the problem, I prefer to close it as > RESOLVED FIXED. In this case, it is clear that a developer committed > something for this particular bug. Someone fixed it by intention. > > Otherwise, if it started to work without any commit message, I would > close it as WORKSFORME.
So IMHO, in an ideal world we would have: no statement from dev he thinks it is fixed, but QA cant reproduce it anymore => RESOLVED/WORKSFORME (and maybe ping the dev about it) statement from the dev he thinks it is fixed, but not checked by QA => RESOLVED/FIXED statement from the dev he thinks it is fixed, but QA finds otherwise => REOPENED statement from the dev he thinks it is fixed, checked by QA => VERIFIED/FIXED statement from the dev he thinks it is fixed, checked by QA, released in a non-rc/non-beta/non-daily => CLOSED/FIXED Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
