Joel Madero píše v Čt 02. 08. 2012 v 14:42 -0700: > At what point do we put resolved as a status? Is it when it's > committed to master branch? If not then is the developer/qa team > expected to continue to check a patchs status after it's already > committed to master in order to find out if it's committed elsewhere? > Thanks in advance, I'm not positive I've been doing it right :-/ A few > I marked as RESOLVED because I know they are fixed in master and will > soon be seen by other users as resolved as well.
I would mark it as RESOLVED when the fix is pushed in all branches where we want it. IMHO, it means that the work is done from the developer side. We always want it in master. Sometimes, we want to backport it into older products which need some developer input as well. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
