Hi Petr, all,
Thanks for your detailed (mostly skipped below) view, Petr. I simply
agree. It's much to easy to say that this has more or less bugs.
Petr Mladek wrote (07-02-12 12:22)
I have the feeling that 3.5.0 is better than 3.4.0, so the trend might
be positive.
I do most work with beta's RC's and once the 3.5.0 is out, I'll switch
back to doing most work with the builds from master...
Sometimes costs me a few hours testing/hunting bugs, but is mostly
perfect for my type of work (good mixture of medium complex/size
docs/sheets/presentations)
I agree that the situation is not ideal. We need more people doing QA,
triaging bugs, ... I think that we still need to improve the wiki pages
that might help volunteers to start. We need to propagate the existing
ones, ...
Yes, it grows, but slowly in my impression.
Our biggest problem is that the developers seem to be smarter in
attracting more hands ;-)
Well, I am not sure where now is the best time to communicate this. It
might be long discussion and it might be better to do it later when 3.5
is out and in a reasonable state.
Well, any time provided not too much :-)
But it's good to discuss the situation regularly to keep sharp on it!
thanks all and looking forward to our great 3.5.0,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
