https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168912
--- Comment #8 from Danat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to BogdanB from comment #3) > (In reply to Danat from comment #2) > > (In reply to BogdanB from comment #1) > > > Repeat heading is very useful when the table is more than one page, so, > > > you > > > want to know each column what is about. Other way you can have just > > > numbers > > > on the second page without any meaning. What is the problem with this?... > > > > It can be a bit confusing for novice users who don't know the settings well. > > But this isn't critical, as you can turn it off. I'm sorry if this doesn't > > deserve your attention > > I consider to be a good thing. make a test with a table just with numbers > that fills 4 pages and tell me what the number 1542,45 represent on column 5 > an row 24 from page 54... You can not know without a heading in the top of > the table on that page... "Repeat heading" inherited from an attached table results in weird outcomes when a few lines that exceeded the page get the header even though they don't need it and it doesn't look nice https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TDuGuu9x5zLL21w38ZFi44Mu6joKynHF/view?usp=sharing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
