I'm not against changing the wording, but as I said before I am not supporting release/0.8 myself.
-- Sean McG. -----Original Message----- From: Luca Barbato <[email protected]> Sender: "libav-devel" <[email protected]>Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:52:43 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: libav development <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [libav-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Announce new releases: 11.3, 10.6, 9.18 and 0.8.17 On 23/03/15 21:15, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Vittorio Giovara > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Sean McGovern <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I definitely have no intention to support old (> 2 years) trees. If someone >>> wants to step up to the plate, go ahead. >> >> I am all for dropping 0.8, but there might still be need of additional >> point releases. Just drop the 'final' clause >> >>> With our new release schedule, maintaining more than 3-4 trees is >>> ultimately untenable. We don't have the resources. >>> >>> When release/12 comes out, we'll have rels 9 through 12 to support, plus >>> HEAD. >> >> That's why I was suggesting to call 'final' release 10. Since 11 is >> 100% compatibile, we can invite downstream users to update to 11 >> instead. >> >> Opinions from the crowd? > > Ping. No objections? > Not for me. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
