On 23/03/15 21:15, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Vittorio Giovara
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Sean McGovern <[email protected]> wrote:
I definitely have no intention to support old (> 2 years) trees. If someone
wants to step up to the plate, go ahead.
I am all for dropping 0.8, but there might still be need of additional
point releases. Just drop the 'final' clause
With our new release schedule, maintaining more than 3-4 trees is ultimately
untenable. We don't have the resources.
When release/12 comes out, we'll have rels 9 through 12 to support, plus HEAD.
That's why I was suggesting to call 'final' release 10. Since 11 is
100% compatibile, we can invite downstream users to update to 11
instead.
Opinions from the crowd?
Ping. No objections?
Not for me.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
