On 10/14/2012 05:17 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Luca Barbato <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 10/14/2012 04:52 PM, John Stebbins wrote:
>>> +    uint8_t forced;
>> why uint8_t ? I guess it would require a version bump btw.
> Add a flags member instead so more things can be added later without
> changing ABI incompatibly again.
Ok. What data type would you like for this?  uint32_t to allow more flags?
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to