On 10/14/2012 05:14 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 10/14/2012 04:52 PM, John Stebbins wrote: >> + uint8_t forced; > why uint8_t ? I guess it would require a version bump btw. > > In itself looks a good feature (and probably the players would enjoy > having this information) > >
uint8_t appears to be used in a lot of places for boolean values. Is there something more appropriate? _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
