On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:51:34AM +0400, Kirill Gavrilov wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Tested to work as expected on MinGW and Cygwin.
> >
> > Good work, please push.  This should make us work out-of-the-box
> > without extra flags on DOS and MinGW :-)
> 
> Sorry for stupid question. MinGW provides _mm_malloc() / _mm_free()
> functions for alignment allocation.
> Why them not used in libavutil instead of memalign_hack branch? Them known
> to be buggy?

Patches welcome, maybe you can implement and test that?

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to