On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Tested to work as expected on MinGW and Cygwin.
>
> Good work, please push.  This should make us work out-of-the-box
> without extra flags on DOS and MinGW :-)
>

Sorry for stupid question. MinGW provides _mm_malloc() / _mm_free()
functions for alignment allocation.
Why them not used in libavutil instead of memalign_hack branch? Them known
to be buggy?
-----------------------------------------------
Kirill Gavrilov,
Software designer.
<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to