Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > You modify the expected return value of a test for pkg-config and in > doing so, I think you may be invalidating the test.
Matt did that about 3 months ago. > I have not yet had the time to dig deeper into it, so it's possible > I'm missing something, however, the script's comments say it's > testing for a broken popt lib. I use a system-installed version of > popt in LightCube and when I compile pkg-config linked to that popt, > all tests pass without modification. I think the change is to the internal pkg-config version of popt. If an external version of popt is used, then the change to the test may not be needed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
