On 16.07.2016 00:44, Hartmut Knaack wrote: > Appearance > ========== > In my test case, ufraw crashes with the message "Segmentation fault (core > dumped)", when I open a Raw image of a camera which is unsupported by > lensfun, and select in the lens correction tab the model "PanoTools Lens > Model". >
Thanks for your report. > Details > ======= > By debugging lfModifier::lfModifier I figured that crop is set to zero by > ufraw in case that no lensfun profile exists for the specific camera. I don't understand why ufraw tries to run the lfModifier if there is no lensfun profile or crop factor available? Both are essential to get any meaningful output from the lfModifier. BTW: Is the *lens argument set to NULL in this case? > Suggested fix > ============= > Check variables used as divisor for being non-zero before engaging a > division. Either return an error condition or set the variable to a sane > default value. > Well, the question is what happens afterwards. If ufraw feeds a crop factor of 0 without calibration data, what's the expected outcome? Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ Lensfun-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users
