https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463854
--- Comment #1 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- I believe in master branch, the original field from which Payee was detected is included in it's entirety in the memo. I don't know if there is any chance that this will be back-ported to 5.1 or not. What date does the transaction end up having? Also - saying the date is lost implies that there is a date field in the import which is lost. What is actually lost is the full original content of the Payee field, Have I understood correctly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
