https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389286
--- Comment #4 from Philippe Martin <philippe.martin...@sfr.fr> --- (In reply to Jack from comment #3) > I just tried this in 4.8.1 on Linux, and I am not able to even create a > scheduled transaction with an amount of $0 whether or not I check for > varying amount. Is there any reason this should be different on Windows? I am using version 4.8.0; dunno if it makes a difference (actually, I have been creating scheduled transactions with 0 amount for *years* with previous versions.) > > Are you trying to edit the scheduled transaction (to change something other > than the amount?) or are you talking about actually entering a transaction? > In fact, I always do the same mistake: when I wish to enter a transaction, I double-click on it (instead of right clicking, so I am in fact in the process of editing the scheduled transaction while I think I am entering a transaction); I set the date and amount, and (bingo!) I end up with an updated scheduled transaction with an amount that is no longer 0... and I cannot reset it to 0 Don't ask me why I insist on having a scheduled transaction with 0 amount :-). I am used to do it this way, they are sort of "highlighted" in the list and since the amount is highly variable, using 0 is the most sensible value (IMHO). I was curious to understand the different behavior of the software when creating or when editing (and pleaaaaaaase do not make it consistent by removing the possibility of creating a scheduled transaction with 0 amount!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
