https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389286
--- Comment #2 from Philippe Martin <philippe.martin...@sfr.fr> --- (In reply to Thomas Baumgart from comment #1) > An amount of 0 does not > make sense in this regard. > > To workaround your problem, use an amount of 0.01. My point is that it is perfectly possible to *create* a scheduled transaction with an amount of 0.... The issue is only when editing the transaction (therefore, my current workaround is to delete the scheduled transaction and create a new one... still with an amount set to 0) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
