Hi Jack, On Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 12:17:01 CEST Jack wrote:
> Hi Thomas, > > On 2017.10.16 04:55, Thomas Baumgart wrote: > > On Sonntag, 15. Oktober 2017 18:09:06 CEST Jack wrote: > >> [is there any better way to refer to a version compiled from git > >> head master branch?] [will we add a kmymoney5 as a bugzilla option, > >> or should we just change kmymoney4 to kmymoney, perhaps after > >> release of 5.0?] > > > > We need to clean this up. It is a bit unstructured right now. I only > > look at the kmymoney4 product (don't know where the one w/o number > > comes from). I expect tickets against master to have master as the > > version. If a specific sha1 is important, one could mention that in > > the ticket itself. > > At the moment, only kmymoney2 and kmymoney4 exist. If we can use > "master" listed as the version, then we don't need a versioned > application name, so at some future point, I thought we could change > kmymoney4 to plain kmymoney, which doesn't currently exist in bugzilla. I am not sure, what you are looking at, but https://bugs.kde.org/enter_bug.cgi shows the attached list of products for me. More entries exist on product kmymoney4 and it might be a good idea to triage them and move them over to kmymoney (we need to make sure the categories exist there as well). Nothing, we need to do immediately but should keep in mind. -- Regards Thomas Baumgart https://www.telegram.org/ Telegram, the better WhatsApp ------------------------------------------------------------- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
