Hi, On Wednesday 11 February 2015 20:36:07 Christian Dávid wrote:
> Hi, > > I was just wondering why KMyMoney has an internal distinction between > transfers and splits? I think you mean transactions and splits. Transfers are a special form of transactions. The general answer: historical reasons. > An alternative could be to use splits only. Like in the SQL database now > they could have a transferId and a splitId. Only the transferId and the > combination (transferId, splitId) are unique. To display the data all > splits with the same transferId are grouped to transaction. Just an idea. Yes, but you cannot eliminate the transaction object as it contains certain information which is identical in each split (e.g. dates, currency, ...). -- Regards Thomas Baumgart GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429 4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA ------------------------------------------------------------- If it's there and you can see it, it's real. If it's there and you can't see it, it's transparent. If it's not there and you can see it, it's virtual. If it's not there and you can't see it, it's gone. -------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
