> On July 16, 2014, 12:52 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote:
> > dependency-data-kf5-qt5, line 616
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119305/diff/1/?file=290515#file290515line616>
> >
> >     I'm assuming by "Holidays" you're referring to kdepimlibs, so that can 
> > be specified here (and appears to be a required, not optional, dependency):
> >     
> >     extragear/office/kmymoney: kde/kdepimlibs
> >     
> >     This would also take care of QGpgme.
> >     
> >     As far as Gpgmepp, that is a non-KDE dependency, isn't it? We only 
> > track KDE projects within this metadata file, external dependencies are 
> > required to be installed separately within the CI system.
> 
> Marko Käning wrote:
>     Ok, I thought that those 3 deps would be separate FWs.
> 
> Cristian Oneț wrote:
>     Actually Gpgmepp is a KDE dependency since it's part of kdepimlibs 
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepimlibs/repository/revisions/frameworks/entry/gpgme++/CMakeLists.txt#L54
>  so if kdepimlibs is really added as a dependency (btw I don see kdepimlibs 
> here http://build.kde.org/job/kmymoney_frameworks_qt5/1/console) then it 
> should build fine.
>     
>     I hope the 'make the dependency optional' part will come but plese note 
> that it's not yet committed. Anyway, even when it will it's still good to 
> build with kdepimlibs present when possible.
> 
> Marko Käning wrote:
>     Yes, I follow the discussion on KMYMONEY-DEVEL and am aware of that it 
> his in question whether the use of an optional dependency is going to be 
> allowed.
>     
>     See https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119308/ where I have added the 
> logical dependency information for KF5-kdepimlibs.

That change shouldn't have been needed to get this working. What obstacle did 
you run into?


- Ben


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119305/#review62454
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 16, 2014, 12:32 a.m., Marko Käning wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119305/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 16, 2014, 12:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KMymoney, Ben Cooksley and Michael Pyne.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-build-metadata
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Herewith I intended to bring kmymoney to the OSX/CI system, but it is still 
> also missing on the linux system for KF5...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   dependency-data-kf5-qt5 6819771be9eeddd37586570dd63b5fe9115c554e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119305/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It doesn't build yet, since I don't know how to handle the optional deps to 
> frameworks Holidays, Gpgmepp and QGpgme.
> 
> Alkimia is still not building on OSX, though. (Its logical dependency 
> structure already exists.) 
> 
> I'll post the problem on kmymoney-devel.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marko Käning
> 
>

_______________________________________________
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMyMoney-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel

Reply via email to