On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Alvaro Soliverez <asolive...@kde.org> wrote: > The only problem I see with this timetable is that we are usually for > at least 2 weeks of string freeze. If we agree that there won't be any > features until after release, I'd say we declare a string on June 15th > until release.
Done, I've move the final release to 1st of August 2011 [1]. > Also, I'll be on travel in the 2nd half of June and with a busy > schedule all through August, so my help will be limited. Whatever time > I have will be mostly devoted to make Alkimia take off for good. Well, Alkimia deserves the love :). > I do follow the progress and I'm very glad to see that you've taken > the amount of bugs back to the 70ish range. Great job! > Thanks, Regards, Cristian [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KMyMoney > Regards, > Alvaro > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Cristian Oneț <onet.crist...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Cristian Oneț <onet.crist...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hello everybody, >>> >>> I think it is about time do decide the release schedule of the upcoming 4.6 >>> betas and 4.6 itself. Although the pace of development was rather slow >>> lately >>> we have now in trunk enough features so we can ship 4.6. I would like to >>> mention the usage of libalkimia, the CSV importer plugin and the performance >>> improvements (related to the accounts model). I know about anyone currently >>> working on features so I think we should focus on stabilizing 4.6 so we >>> could >>> release it. >>> >>> For this we need to make some bug triaging. We already have 156 bugs (where >>> are the good old days we have about 30-70 :)) and a lot of them need extra >>> info. I would like to ask the help of the SVN users to try to review the bug >>> list if they have some spare time. Bugs that don't have any activity for a >>> long time and can't be reproduced are dead anyway and should be closed >>> because, as the list keeps getting bigger, we keep loosing focus of the >>> issues >>> that can and should be fixed. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> I would be also happy if we just triage the bug lists and leave 4.6 for >>> now... >>> since the developers are really busy. >> >> From the lack of feedback on this request I get that everyone is >> really busy with real life. Well I would like that we commit ourselves >> to release 4.6 as soon as possible. For that I have updated the >> release schedule proposal (I've removed one beta from the list since I >> don't consider it necessary) [1]. I know that some things from the >> planned feature set will not make it into this release but since we >> stopped maintaining the stable branch it is important that we release >> 4.6 with the current feature set. >> >> I will work on bugfixes throughout this cycle so we can obtain the >> stability I would desire from other KDE applications in KMyMoney. >> >> Thomas, would this schedule be OK for you (since you'll have to make >> the actual releases)? >> >> We would also need someone to create the 'What's new page', Jack >> already announced that he will review the documentation. I can take >> care of the SVN log between 4.5.3 and 4.6. >> >> Please don't consider this as rushing things, I would just like >> everyone out there to migrate to the new version since a lot of bugs >> have been fixed and I have some free time to commit to this goal. >> We've come a long way since KDE 3 :). >> >> Regards, >> Cristian >> >> [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KMyMoney#Version_4.6.0 > _______________________________________________ > KMyMoney-devel mailing list > KMyMoney-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel > _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
