On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:26:01 -0300 Alvaro Soliverez <asolive...@kde.org> wrote:
> The only problem I see with this timetable is that we are usually for > at least 2 weeks of string freeze. If we agree that there won't be any > features until after release, I'd say we declare a string on June 15th > until release. > Also, I'll be on travel in the 2nd half of June and with a busy > schedule all through August, so my help will be limited. Whatever time > I have will be mostly devoted to make Alkimia take off for good. > > I do follow the progress and I'm very glad to see that you've taken > the amount of bugs back to the 70ish range. Great job! I second that. Allan > > Regards, > Alvaro > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Cristian Oneț > <onet.crist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Cristian Oneț > > <onet.crist...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> I think it is about time do decide the release schedule of the > >> upcoming 4.6 betas and 4.6 itself. Although the pace of > >> development was rather slow lately we have now in trunk enough > >> features so we can ship 4.6. I would like to mention the usage of > >> libalkimia, the CSV importer plugin and the performance > >> improvements (related to the accounts model). I know about anyone > >> currently working on features so I think we should focus on > >> stabilizing 4.6 so we could release it. > >> > >> For this we need to make some bug triaging. We already have 156 > >> bugs (where are the good old days we have about 30-70 :)) and a > >> lot of them need extra info. I would like to ask the help of the > >> SVN users to try to review the bug list if they have some spare > >> time. Bugs that don't have any activity for a long time and can't > >> be reproduced are dead anyway and should be closed because, as the > >> list keeps getting bigger, we keep loosing focus of the issues > >> that can and should be fixed. > >> > >> Any thoughts? > >> > >> I would be also happy if we just triage the bug lists and leave > >> 4.6 for now... since the developers are really busy. > > > > From the lack of feedback on this request I get that everyone is > > really busy with real life. Well I would like that we commit > > ourselves to release 4.6 as soon as possible. For that I have > > updated the release schedule proposal (I've removed one beta from > > the list since I don't consider it necessary) [1]. I know that some > > things from the planned feature set will not make it into this > > release but since we stopped maintaining the stable branch it is > > important that we release 4.6 with the current feature set. > > > > I will work on bugfixes throughout this cycle so we can obtain the > > stability I would desire from other KDE applications in KMyMoney. > > > > Thomas, would this schedule be OK for you (since you'll have to make > > the actual releases)? > > > > We would also need someone to create the 'What's new page', Jack > > already announced that he will review the documentation. I can take > > care of the SVN log between 4.5.3 and 4.6. > > > > Please don't consider this as rushing things, I would just like > > everyone out there to migrate to the new version since a lot of bugs > > have been fixed and I have some free time to commit to this goal. > > We've come a long way since KDE 3 :). > > > > Regards, > > Cristian > > > > [1] http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KMyMoney#Version_4.6.0 > _______________________________________________ > KMyMoney-devel mailing list > KMyMoney-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
