Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> had replied:
> Of course, I should note that it's your OTI proposal that I'm suggesting 
> you bring to the working group.  The bit about public flogging should be 
> written up separately and sent directly to [email protected], 
> without prior publication as an I-D, per item 19 in the FAQ at 
> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcfaq.html>

Your deadline of 2007-04-01 is coming up.  You should probably hurry
if you want this to be accepted.

        ;-)

                                -Marcus Watts
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

Reply via email to