https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303861
--- Comment #31 from Grégory Oestreicher <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #30) > I have the xml responses ready, but I don't know what I am exactly looking > for and which part you need. One of the resource requests should contain <current-user-privilege-set/>. Look at the server response for a matching tag, and the ones enclosed in it. > There is no response like > "<D:privilege><D:read/><D:write/></D:privilege>". OK, so this may mean that no ACL is set on the addressbook. In that case the resource gives you all privileges. > On the other hand (not knowing the specifications) I am not sure if it would > make sense for the adressbook. While it is possible to share calendars in > Exchange and have different privileges for those, there is no adressbook > sharing. At least as far as I know. So I assume one should have always write > permissions to the adressbook? I'm not using Exchange so I can't be sure how it works, but with other groupware solutions you can have multiple address books such as a corporate one and a personal one. No one should be able to write to the corporate, so ACLs come in play here. Cheers, Grégory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
