> On Oct. 29, 2016, 7:49 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > autotests/jobtest.cpp, line 283 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129275/diff/2/?file=483171#file483171line283> > > > > It's stream.flush() that you need, to tell QTextStream to do the actual > > writing to the underlying device. > > > > QTextStream only flushes automatically when being deleted or when the > > underlying device is a file and is closed. > > > > Once doing stream.flush() here, this test fails like the other one, so > > this isn't related to QXmlStreamWriter, but to passing an open > > QTemporaryFile as the device to storedPut. We need to at least rewind it to > > pos 0...
Confirmed, tempFile.seek(0) before KIO::storedPut() fixes it. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129275/#review100384 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 29, 2016, 10:35 a.m., Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129275/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 29, 2016, 10:35 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. > > > Repository: kio > > > Description > ------- > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368314 seems to be an actual bug in KIO, > rather than a regression in kwalletmanager. I reproduced the bug in a test > case: basically `StoredTransferJob` fails to copy a QTemporaryFile when the > file has been written by a QXmlStreamWriter (destination file is created, but > empty). > > If we write to the temp file using a QTextStreamer instead, everything works > as expected... > > > Diffs > ----- > > autotests/jobtest.h 5687b4a448d26d703d33603e5a0939bc4f8c77b4 > autotests/jobtest.cpp 11bac4d51e97840181aff99fdddb92cdf4db1ba2 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129275/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > jobtest still passes (with one expected failure). > > > Thanks, > > Elvis Angelaccio > >
