On Tuesday 19 August 2014 08:44:10 David Faure wrote: > On Friday 15 August 2014 12:51:58 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > And that's the problem if we release them. If it's released "with the > > rest" expect people to have wrong expectations about them. > > > > A possibility would be perhaps to produce nightly tarballs for those > > frameworks which don't have the "release: true" flag. This way they keep > > not being part of a release, and early adopters have something easy to > > grab. > > Wouldn't early adopters just checkout and build from git ?
Well, I guess some of them might just want to grab something and run with it. Maybe not the majority indeed... > I don't know about you, but I almost never download a source tarball, > because a git checkout is just so much easier to update later. > We mostly make tarballs for packagers, and the non-mature frameworks we're > talking about should definitely NOT be packaged. Agreed. > IMHO the solution is just to publicize the upcoming frameworks somewhere. Which shouldn't be that hard, it's "only" about processing the yaml file and creating a page listing them. I think that's what makes most sense indeed. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
