-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109667/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated June 22, 2013, 9:31 a.m.)


Review request for KDE Frameworks and Oswald Buddenhagen.


Description
-------

If it can fail, i want to know it so i can tell my users


Diffs (updated)
-----

  KDE5PORTING.html ba67bdc 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfig_compiler/test_signal.cpp.ref fc04701 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfig_compiler/test_signal.h.ref f43f7dd 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfigguitest.cpp e6b4c17 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfigtest.h 17a5294 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/kconfigtest.cpp 00ffc2a 
  tier2/kconfig/autotests/ksharedconfigtest.cpp 2bb612f 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kconfig.h 597330f 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kconfig.cpp d26f941 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kconfigbase.h ce190f3 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kconfiggroup.h ff63afa 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kconfiggroup.cpp 53cac13 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kcoreconfigskeleton.h 3e4971b 
  tier2/kconfig/src/core/kcoreconfigskeleton.cpp c0ad044 
  tier2/kconfig/src/kconfig_compiler/kconfig_compiler.cpp 47963a5 

Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109667/diff/


Testing
-------

New Unitttest passes


Thanks,

Albert Astals Cid

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to