El dimecres, 20 de maig de 2020, a les 6:07:28 CEST, Ivan Romanov va escriure:
> IANA doesn't provide any licesnse info. 

If there's no license info, that means that we can't ship it. Please remove it 
from our repositories ASAP and think twice before adding things we don't know 
the license of.

> Anyway how to apply license to
> CSV file? I not sure that CSV format supports comments. Also seems now
> I must add another script to modify downloaded CSV file or add
> instruction how to modify this file to satisfy all policies.

You mean the CSV from IANA is not the direct input of the script?

Oh I see you already removed the script, you keep not doing Merge Requests even 
if i keep asking you.

Not cool.

Albert

> 
> > El dimarts, 19 de maig de 2020, a les 17:12:16 CEST, Ivan Romanov va
> > escriure:
> > > Tried to fix.
> > > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/qca/-/commit/b69aab24315cc6821cc1da928e95cc0a4c42e311
> > > Now enough good?
> > 
> > Not sure, what's the license of the csv file?
> > 
> > Given it comes from iana, are we sure we can distribute it?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >   Albert
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 00:09:32 +0200
> > > Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > El dilluns, 18 de maig de 2020, a les 23:55:11 CEST, Johan
> > > > Ouwerkerk va escriure:
> > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:59 PM Ivan Romanov <driz...@zoho.eu>
> > > > > wrote:  
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Today I added generated file to QCA repo. This commit
> > > > > > https://invent.kde.org/libraries/qca/-/commit/cf929ce541b48e36a54691a37b31211d17334bf7.
> > > > > > And got such email mesage: The files marked with a * at the
> > > > > > end have a non valid license. Please read:
> > > > > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy and use
> > > > > > the headers which are listed at that page.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So which header/license I should use in my case?  
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'd use the same license as for the main project -- but someone
> > > > > else might have a better reasoned opinion than just "that would
> > > > > make sense to me" ;)
> > > > > 
> > > > > However looking at your particular commit I notice a few things:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2. The actual source (CSV) not being committed (judging by the
> > > > > diff)  
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, that's not acceptable.
> > > > 
> > > > How are we supposed to run the script again?
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >   Albert
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 




Reply via email to