2015-09-07 17:35 GMT+02:00 Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it>: > On Monday 07 of September 2015 17:19:01 Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> Hi there! >> Just FYI, while the specification doesn't demand but only suggests the >> name change, it seems to be essential for the Fedora AppStream data >> generator. >> For that and to do sane naming of the data files, renaming the files >> makes sense - although, for the KDE l10n team this means some >> annoyance. >> >> I'll therefore rename the files and try to find someone from the l10n >> team to do the renamings of the l10n templates as well. > > Not just the templates, but all the translations. I can do it later today. > > On the other side, can we fix the specifications then? Either it's not > mandatory that they should match and the Fedora AppStream data is zealous in a > pointless way, punishing applications for no reason (or buggy), or it's really > mandatory.
I am currently discussing with Richard how this should be handled. The Debian AppStream generator does not have this "problem", it only cares for a properly-set <id/> tag in the XML. So, only people using appstream-builder are affected by that (which isn't only Fedora, I think Arch is using that too, maybe OpenSUSE?). Cheers, Matthias -- Debian Developer | Freedesktop-Developer I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/ >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
