On Monday 07 of September 2015 17:19:01 Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Hi there! > Just FYI, while the specification doesn't demand but only suggests the > name change, it seems to be essential for the Fedora AppStream data > generator. > For that and to do sane naming of the data files, renaming the files > makes sense - although, for the KDE l10n team this means some > annoyance. > > I'll therefore rename the files and try to find someone from the l10n > team to do the renamings of the l10n templates as well.
Not just the templates, but all the translations. I can do it later today. On the other side, can we fix the specifications then? Either it's not mandatory that they should match and the Fedora AppStream data is zealous in a pointless way, punishing applications for no reason (or buggy), or it's really mandatory. Ciao -- Luigi >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
