> On May 5, 2014, 2:05 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > What is the speed difference compared to the old QString API, but without > > the word-count there? Afaik, the word-count is the major bottleneck and > > removing it alone should greatly speed up the test. > > > > Having a QByteArray in the API would be fine if you document that the data > > _must_ be UTF8. But a meaningful performance test here must include the > > later conversion to std::string for xapian, imo. I.e. what you want to test > > is file -> qbytearray -> std::string vs. file -> qstring -> std::string. > > Vishesh Handa wrote: > Original: 60 msecs > Without Word Count: 30 msecs > Without Word Count + ByteArray: 8 msecs
cool, looks promising. And how slow would be your patch right now, just with result->append(QString::fromUtf8(arr)); Or is that then the 30msecs? Just wondering what the impact of using STL instead of QIODevice/QFile is here. - Milian ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117996/#review57314 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 5, 2014, 2:01 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117996/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 5, 2014, 2:01 p.m.) > > > Review request for Baloo and Milian Wolff. > > > Repository: kfilemetadata > > > Description > ------- > > Add an append(QByteArray) method to the ExtractionResult > > This way plugins can choose to return the data in utf8 or as a QString, > and the clients can either just let the standard QString::fromUtf8 > function do its magic, or implement some special handling if they wish. > > This speeds up the PlainTextExtractor quite a bit (60msec vs 8.3msec) > > Unfortunately, this meant discarding the extraction of WordCount from > the Plain Text extractor. Though considering the speed difference, I > think it is worth it. > > > Diffs > ----- > > autotests/indexerextractortests.cpp 6b7c605 > autotests/simpleresult.h f3793b5 > src/extractionresult.h 76dfe59 > src/extractionresult.cpp 9bc7946 > src/extractors/plaintextextractor.cpp 5a38857 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117996/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
