On 09/30/2011 01:29 PM, todd rme wrote:
I don't think any of those are good options, since all of them have the same result: spamming developers with huge amounts of useless information. This would only make it far more difficult to manage bug reports. Just being patient seems like the only solution that could work in practice on a large scale.
Inquiring about the state of a piece of work which a person is responsible for is not "huge amounts of useless information". If some of these bugs are patiently left unaddressed then we end up where we are right now: with bugs left open for years, with the whole bug report process being left broken and with users wasting their time filing bug reports which will never be addressed. How is this a better way of handling things?
Rui Maciel
Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
