On Wednesday 09 October 2013, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hi, > > I know it's a bit too early, but still better than late. I'd like to > know your thoughts about the way KF5 frameworks will be packaged for > Linux distributions. > > I'm currently working on including Hawaii desktop (based around a Qt5 > and Wayland-based compositor) in Fedora. We aim at delivering it around > two Fedora releases in future therefore it makes sense to work on > packaging already. It currently depends on frameworks from kdelibs > framework branch (currently it's probably just tier1/solid) and extra > cmake modules. > > I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-* > prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE > seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM).
IMHO extra-cmake-modules really should not get a "kf5" prefix, this would IMO at least partly defeat its purpose. It was intended as addons for cmake (which happen to be useful for KDE), not as a tier0 package of KF5. Not sure if this changed though. Alex
