Hi, I know it's a bit too early, but still better than late. I'd like to know your thoughts about the way KF5 frameworks will be packaged for Linux distributions.
I'm currently working on including Hawaii desktop (based around a Qt5 and Wayland-based compositor) in Fedora. We aim at delivering it around two Fedora releases in future therefore it makes sense to work on packaging already. It currently depends on frameworks from kdelibs framework branch (currently it's probably just tier1/solid) and extra cmake modules. I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-* prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM). [1] [1] http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/KDE:/Unstable:/Frameworks/openSUSE_12.3/src/ My other question is about the modularization of kdelibs. Do you intend to split it into separate GIT repositories? Or does it make sense to build binary packages for frameworks from a single source package (this would be a bit difficult to to package properly). Thank you! Lubo
