On Saturday, 4 de December de 2010 12:00:55 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 4 de December de 2010 01:29:13 Thomas Lübking wrote: > > Am Saturday 04 December 2010 schrieb Michael Pyne: > > > Hmm, this is what I'd call an "answer by accident" at work. (unsigned)0 > > > is > > > > Sorry for hooking in with a semi-OT sidequestion: > > Is "0u" gcc specific then? > > No. > > 0u is ISO C standard. > > Also, a literal integer is automatically converted to the right type if the > size fits. So 0 is a valid unsigned integer, but 128 isn't a valid uchar.
Interestingly, "false" is 0, so false automatically and without warnings can
be converted to any integer. And pointer...
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
