On Saturday, 4 de December de 2010 01:29:13 Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am Saturday 04 December 2010 schrieb Michael Pyne: > > Hmm, this is what I'd call an "answer by accident" at work. (unsigned)0 > > is > > Sorry for hooking in with a semi-OT sidequestion: > > Is "0u" gcc specific then?
No.
0u is ISO C standard.
Also, a literal integer is automatically converted to the right type if the
size fits. So 0 is a valid unsigned integer, but 128 isn't a valid uchar.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
