https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465932

--- Comment #6 from Paul Christophe <paul.christo...@skynet.be> ---
If one or more tags are selected in the left "tags" panel and if one or more
tags are selected in the right "filter" panel, the additional application of a
NAND/NOR operator would eliminate from the left selection the images that do
not respond to the application of the NAND/NOR operator; that is to say, they
would be eliminated if any of the tagged ones are present (NOR), or they would
be eliminated if all the tagged ones are present together (NAND). 
In electronics, logic knows how to do everything with NOR or NAND circuits and
can be satisfied with that ;-)

Paul Christophe


-----Message d'origine-----
De : fch22 [mailto:bugzilla_nore...@kde.org] 
Envoyé : vendredi 21 juillet 2023 11:05
À : paul.christo...@skynet.be
Objet : [digikam] [Bug 465932] NOR and NAND operators to filter item

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465932

--- Comment #5 from fch22 <frederic.cha...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to fch22 from comment #3)
> just discover the option "- this tag must not be included"  
> but effectively, not easy to find it.
> Would be more efficient to add it to the existing criteria AND, OR

(In reply to Paul Christophe from comment #4)
> Allow me to insist once again.
> Rather than a well-hidden "This tag must not be included" option, it would
> be more effective to add the "NOR" and "NAND" operators to the "OR" and
> "AND" filter operators. it would be nice if the active operator remained
> visible or was highlighted.
> 


I started to play with it and this was exactly what I was looking for. with
such option we can make a filter with a tag and not another tag. Effectively
the access to this option should be improved , but we need to ensure the same
behavior remains available.
In particular just adding a "NAND" to the existing list (OR, AND) will help to
exclude all the selected tags , but will not allow to filter out pictures with
a tag and not another one. so what we would need is a NOT attached to the tag. 
May be we could use the radio button attached to the tag as follow:
v => means tag should be found
x => means tag shouldn't be found

I don't know if this is possible, but it would be very powerful.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to