https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462578
--- Comment #6 from y...@masson-informatique.fr --- Thanks for the time you already spent on this issue. You suggestions look good to me, but as you asked for it I would still like to propose improvements. Feel free to use it or not: 1. "Invalid Pages Definition" -> "Définition des pages non valable" -> "Définition des pages non valide". I really prefer "valide" over "valable" in this case but it might be completely subjective. See the following link for an interesting comparison of these words: https://vitrinelinguistique.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/22917/le-vocabulaire/nuances-semantiques/difference-entre-valable-et-valide 2. "%1 does not follow the correct syntax. Please use « , » to separate ranges and pages, « - » to define ranges and make sure ranges do not intersect with each other." -> "%1 est syntaxiquement incorrect. Veuillez utiliser « , » pour séparer les pages ou les plages de pages, « - » pour définir des plages de pages et assurez-vous que les plages ne se recouvrent pas." -> in this case, if you use "plage de pages" and not just "plage", you could better use "suite de page" which is easier to read (and we know how much people dislike reading error messages… :-) ) Thanks again, Yvan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
