https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399149
--- Comment #71 from Alexandre Pereira <pereira.a...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #70) > (In reply to Alexandre Pereira from comment #69) > > (In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #68) > > > (In reply to Alexandre Pereira from comment #67) > > > > (In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #66) > > > > > > > > > > is it possible to test again with latest master? > > > I have just made a commit that could reduce cpu usage from windows > > > tracking > > > vastly > > > > Hi, > > > > I just tried it, before with latest "release version" ( on archlinux ) and > > then using the aur git package: same results. > > > > Still, using latte-dock with a kwin rules using the title as rule, will make > > latte-dock use about 5% cpu for each window ( in this case i tested with 3 > > windows, so about 15% cpu usage ). > > > > Removing kwin rule bounded by title ( but still with rules inforced, but > > only by class and executable ) made latte-dock go to 0-1% cpu usage. > > > > Strange is, kwin rule by title with a window that is constantly changing > > titles, makes latte-dock high cpu usage, but not plasmashell. > > > > I have been using latte-dock with this workaround: renamed the wine > > executables and then made rules based on the executables name ( and not make > > any specification about the titles in the rules ). > > are you sure that the AUR git version is containing yesterday commits? > > https://phabricator.kde.org/source/latte-dock/history/master/ > > because in this commit there is a fix for batch kwin signaling for window > title changes... I checked the "cache" git log, its the latest version. latte-dock -v gives me 0.8.75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
