https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399149
--- Comment #70 from Michail Vourlakos <mvourla...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Alexandre Pereira from comment #69) > (In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #68) > > (In reply to Alexandre Pereira from comment #67) > > > (In reply to Michail Vourlakos from comment #66) > > > > > > > is it possible to test again with latest master? > > I have just made a commit that could reduce cpu usage from windows tracking > > vastly > > Hi, > > I just tried it, before with latest "release version" ( on archlinux ) and > then using the aur git package: same results. > > Still, using latte-dock with a kwin rules using the title as rule, will make > latte-dock use about 5% cpu for each window ( in this case i tested with 3 > windows, so about 15% cpu usage ). > > Removing kwin rule bounded by title ( but still with rules inforced, but > only by class and executable ) made latte-dock go to 0-1% cpu usage. > > Strange is, kwin rule by title with a window that is constantly changing > titles, makes latte-dock high cpu usage, but not plasmashell. > > I have been using latte-dock with this workaround: renamed the wine > executables and then made rules based on the executables name ( and not make > any specification about the titles in the rules ). are you sure that the AUR git version is containing yesterday commits? https://phabricator.kde.org/source/latte-dock/history/master/ because in this commit there is a fix for batch kwin signaling for window title changes... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
