https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379170
--- Comment #16 from torbj...@stabo.se --- Den 2017-09-18 kl. 01:05, skrev Christoph Feck: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379170 > > --- Comment #15 from Christoph Feck <cf...@kde.org> --- >> expect the reported size to be for the folder *contents*, not the number of >> bytes/blocks used in total for the folder structures on disk. > If you are not expecting the size of data stored on disk, then "disk space > calculation" is not the tool you wanted. That's getting bogged down in semantics, in a ridiculous way. Are you saying that "the total file size" is an invalid definition of "data stored on disk"? I repeat what I said earlier - and I stand by it: If you're including the size of file system structures, then you make the tool worthless for people that wonder if there are files inside some folder. I guess the expected size of a hard disk drive after reading the label is a similar discussion. /Regards, Torbjörn Stabo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
