https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377162
--- Comment #68 from Grósz Dániel <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Taras Oleksyn from comment #67) > From a quick look at the proposed patch - and obviously without having the > full picture - it’s true that it would add some complexity. > But it's code for the sake of people's convenience, not the other way > around, right? > > IMHO, as long as: > - shading is off by default, > - users get a clear message about limitations and SSD/CSD complications > before enabling it, > - the implementation doesn’t introduce impossible-to-maintain logic and > limits some weird edge cases like resizing a shaded window, > > then it’s worth doing. Why did you change the resolution to fixed? I don't know how well the patch works, but in any case, as long as it's not integrated, the bug is not fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
