https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #13 from Bertil Rolf <b.g.r...@gmail.com> --- Hello, You are right, the image quality of Adobe Converter and DigiKam is roughly equivalent. I fed the same CR2 files into both apps without much thought. Except for file size, there is a very significant different for the user, namely processing time. The latest version of Adobe C is very fast while DigiKam 870 on my PC (HP Z240, 32 GB) was intolerably slow for my workflow. Sure, it all comes down to which workflow you are comfortable with. In Adobe, I would convert all raw photos into DNG with AC and cull them afterwards in LR. I guess that in DK, I would need to cull them before feeding them to conversion. I have not tried this option, however. Best regards Bertil Rolf On 2025-05-12 08:13, bugzilla_nore...@kde.org wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640 > > --- Comment #12 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- > I take a look to your comparison images generated from CR2 to Adobe and > digiKam > tool. results are not the same of course, but the result are near and not too > bad after all. > > Did you take a care to render the DNG preview with digiKam using the RAW data > (or Embeded JPEG) for both to compare. Data to compare must be the same type. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
