https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640
--- Comment #15 from Bertil Rolf <b.g.r...@gmail.com> --- About the speed of Adobe conversion, I can only say it is impressive, not how it is attained. Thanks for the hint about BQM. For an advanced amateur like me, the greatest advantage DigiKam has over Lightroom are the DAM features. I use them for selecting photos for slide shows on the fly and play them to my public. This is the main way we look at old photos and DigiKam runs from thin clients I have repurposed for media playing. Although facetagging and geotagging in DigiKam are very fine, I have not found any way to make use of the results in the slide shows. Best regards Bertil Rolf Baden bei Wien On 2025-05-16 13:55, bugzilla_nore...@kde.org wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494640 > > --- Comment #14 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- > Well about the speed, i would expect a multicore/multithread options/functions > in the Adobe DNG SDK that digiKa uses, but no chance, there is nothing like > this. So the conversion processing done by digiKam will run on a single > thread/single core. > > Did you see a multi-core usage with Adobe RAW converter while converting CR2 > to > DNG ? > > Tip: The DNG Convert in digiKam is also available in BQM. So, if you have > enough RAM and Multicore, you can convert more than one file at the same time. > > Gilles Caulier > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
