On 08/07/14 07:51, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Ian Booth <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm somewhat wary of depending on an another "unknown" third party website >> being > > That's hilarious. I haven't been pushing for its usage on juju, and > I'm still not the one actively pushing it, but that's a pretty bad > argument to raise here. >
It wasn't mean to be funny. I'm unsure why it's a bad argument. It's quite prudent to ensure that critical infrastructure on which our development depends meets expectations with regard to uptime, reliability etc (a case in point being the recent issue with an out of date certificate or so I was told). Sorry if the question caused any offence. I raised the question totally independent of that fact that someone within Canonical had set up the site. -- Juju-dev mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
