[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=353025#comment-353025
]
Taylor Jones commented on MSHADE-176:
-------------------------------------
Well, in our particular case, it's an overlap of one class between two Neo4J
libraries. The only difference in the class in this case was that one had a
final declaration. Since we don't have control over the libraries, we can't
remove it and we get a warning from Shade every time.
That being said, the patch is simply to suppress the warning output. I'm not
sure what an integration test would show here.
> Suppress warning output
> -----------------------
>
> Key: MSHADE-176
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-176
> Project: Maven Shade Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Taylor Jones
> Fix For: 2.4
>
> Attachments: suppressWarnings_option.patch
>
>
> The warnings Shade outputs are useful, but there are some cases where nothing
> can actually be done about them. Recently, I encountered this with the Neo4j
> libraries; there is one overlapping class between two critical JARs (kernel
> and rest), and no way to resolve this via exclusions.
> In these cases, everything works just fine. At best, the warnings are just
> noise, but we also have some build processes in place that will fail on Maven
> warnings. I figured this would be a pretty simple thing to just suppress, but
> Shade doesn't seem to have a way to do this.
> I've included a simple patchset to address this which adds a new option to
> the configuration called <suppressWarnings>. There isn't a unit test
> attached, unfortunately. I'm not quite sure how to unit test logging output
> in this fashion without something akin to Mockito. I figured you guys
> wouldn't appreciate me adding dependencies out of the blue but if a unit test
> is required, I can give it a shot.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)
