[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Heinz Marbaise reassigned MENFORCER-186:
---------------------------------------------
Assignee: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Create a rule for the reactor (RequireReactorSameVersion?)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-186
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-186
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Standard Rules
> Affects Versions: 1.3.1
> Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Assignee: Karl Heinz Marbaise
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> It would be nice having a rule which checks the consitency of a multi-module
> build.
> Say having a build with modules like this:
> {code}
> +-- root (pom.xml)
> +--- m1 (pom.xml)
> +--- m11 (pom.xml)
> +--- m12 (pom.xml)
> +--- m2 (pom.xml)
> +--- m21 (pom.xml)
> +--- m21 (pom.xml)
> +--- m3 (pom.xml)
> +--- m31 (pom.xml)
> +--- m31 (pom.xml)
> +--- m4 (pom.xml)
> +--- m5 (pom.xml)
> {code}
> If you have for all modules the version 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT everything is fine.
> But what sometimes it happens that someone changes something and you will
> find things like the following:
> The module m21 (pom.xml) has no a parent version of 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT which
> means maven will try to find this version in repository (you will get a
> warning during the build; But who reads warnings ;-))..
> Or other things having module interdependencies and it happens someone does
> something like this:
> In m4 a dependency is written like this:
> {code}
> <dependency>
> <groupId>TheGroup</groupId>
> <artifactId>m21</artifactId>
> <version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
> {code}
> which will usually build, but it is not correct. or better like this:
> {code}
> <dependency>
> <groupId>TheGroup</groupId>
> <artifactId>m21</artifactId>
> <version>1.1.0</version>
> </dependency>
> {code}
> This means it will be solved against the released version which usually is
> not the intention in such cases.
> So the rule should check if the groupId/artifactId belongs to the reactor and
> check the consistency of the version of the dependencies etc. Also the parent
> would be nice.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)
