[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHARED-295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=335546#comment-335546
]
Frank Jakop edited comment on MSHARED-295 at 11/11/13 3:32 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
We ran in a similar problem situation with surefire 2.9 / plexus-utils 1.5.1.
Our CI server did not kill running java processes on test timeout.
We upgraded to latest surefire (2.16) and saw cli classes relocated to
maven-shared-utils.
Since we're not spawning further processes from our test JVM we can propose a
very simple patch wich solves the problem for our needs.
Perhaps this is more likely to be accepted until Andrey's patch is fully
working. (see MSHARED-295-no-cmd.patch)
was (Author: fj):
We ran in a similar problem situation with surefire 2.9 / plexus-utils
1.5.1. Our CI server did not kill running java processes on test timeout.
Since we're not spawning further processes from our test JVM we can propose a
very simple patch wich solves the problem for our needs.
Perhaps this is more likely to be accepted until Andrey's patch is fully
working. (see MSHARED-295-no-cmd.patch)
> Non reliable killing of processes by CommandLineUtils
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSHARED-295
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHARED-295
> Project: Maven Shared Components
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: maven-shared-utils
> Reporter: Andrey Klochkov
> Assignee: Kristian Rosenvold
> Attachments: MSHARED-295-no-cmd.patch, MSHARED-295.patch
>
>
> CommandLineUtils is used in Maven-Surefire to start forks which execute
> tests. It is a well known issue that sometimes child processes are not killed
> correctly. This is a known limitation of JVM, and the only reliable way to
> implement it would be platform specific.
> Bug report in Surefire JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-773
> JVM bug report. It's Windows specific, but the problem exists on Linux and
> OSX as well.
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4770092
> I'm proposing either 1) to implement several platform specific
> implementations of ProcessHook or 2) to make the mechanism of killing
> processes extendable for clients of the library.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
