[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=270217#comment-270217
]
Dennis Lundberg commented on MCHANGES-259:
------------------------------------------
Yes, that's my preference, to keep things as separate as possible.
If we need the same mappings for Trac, then we should add a TracIMS class that
we use for Trac. That way we are one step ahead of where we currently are: all
supported IMSes have their own implementation and type mapping.
> Create modularity for supporting multiple issue management systems
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MCHANGES-259
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-259
> Project: Maven 2.x Changes Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: other issue-trackers
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Benson Margulies
> Assignee: Benson Margulies
> Attachments: MCHANGES-259.patch
>
>
> In discussion of MCHANGES-245, Dennis notes the need for some global
> modularity for capturing the behavior of the different issue management
> systems. I'm creating this JIRA as a hat-rack to hang this work off of.
> My plan is to start by creating something very simple in the way of an
> abstract class, which can be elaborated as we go.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
