[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MIDEA-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_115128
]
Robert Nicholson commented on MIDEA-107:
----------------------------------------
No I'll try that tomorrow but are you aware of an previous issue that directly
relates to the the problem I've described? I'd certainly like to read the
description of the Issue.
> mvn idea:idea doesn't generated an .iml file that will include a web facet's
> owning module's classes.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIDEA-107
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MIDEA-107
> Project: Maven 2.x IDEA Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Robert Nicholson
>
> In IntelliJ Idea 6 it doesn't look like it was necessary to have a
> containerElement entry under WebModuleProperties for the actual classes of
> the module that owns the facet or web module.
> I am using mvn 2.0.7
> If you take this same .iml file and use it in IntelliJ 7 it will not include
> those classes in the war that's built. It seems something changed b/w Idea 6
> and Idea 7 WRT to how it determines which classes to include into a
> webmodule/facet.
> In 7, you explicitly see the classes as a dependency and you can select
> "copy module output to"
> but in 6. It seems to have implicitly included those classes and doesn't show
> the owning module as an explicit dependency when showing you the jars/modules
> that are "copied" to the war.
> So I think it may be necessary for the mvn idea:idea plugin to include an
> explicit containerElement under packaging for the actual module that owns the
> web facet. In the context of the .iml file you can think of that module as
> "self"
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
