[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17907870#comment-17907870
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNGSITE-550:
----------------------------------------

Bukama commented on code in PR #598:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/598#discussion_r1895761241


##########
content/markdown/whatsnewinmaven4.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
+# What's New in Maven 4?
+
+Maven is over 20 years old, and is one of the most used build tools in the 
Java world.
+Throughout the years, one important rule has been maintaining the highest 
backward compatibility possible, especially
+with its [POM-schema with Model version 4.0.0][2], used not only for the build 
itself but also by consumers.
+This made Maven more than a tool; it became a whole ecosystem with many 
dependencies on the POM, especially the Maven
+Central repository, other build tools, and IDEs.
+But this stable schema comes at a price - the lack of flexibility.
+
+> "With the Maven build schema preserved in amber, we can’t evolve much: we’ll 
stay forever with Maven 3 minor releases,
+> unable to implement improvements that we imagine will require seriously 
updating the POM schema…"
+> &mdash; <cite>[Hervé Boutemy (in Javaadvent 2021)][1]</cite>
+
+Maven 4 will prepare for changes which are impossible nowadays, like a 
completely new build schema.
+
+Another pain point of Maven 3 is a codebase with a lot of deprecated, 
convoluted, non-performant, and duplicate code
+which costs the volunteers who maintain Maven a lot of time.
+This means that the Maven codebase contains not only old Java code that can be 
optimized nowadays but also old
+dependencies and poor API design of its own APIs, especially for Maven plugins.
+Therefore, Maven 4 will also be a maintenance release.
+
+This article presents and explains major changes brought by Maven 4, grouped 
into several topics.
+
+## POM Changes
+
+### Build-POM and Consumer-POM
+
+As written in the introduction, Model version 4.0.0 is used not only by the 
build but also by consumers of the
+artifact.
+However, several contents of the POM are only necessary for the build while 
others, like the dependencies, are also
+needed by the consumer.
+Maven 4 will therefore differentiate between a "Build-POM" and a 
"Consumer-POM".
+As the names suggest, the "Build-POM" will contain all information needed to 
build the artifact, e.g., used plugins and
+their configuration, while the "Consumer-POM", which is created during the 
Maven build, will not contain those.
+This POM will only keep what is really needed to use the artifact, e.g., 
dependency information.
+
+**Note**: See below for a comparison of the content of both POMs.
+
+### Model version 4.1.0
+
+With now having two types of POM, Maven 4 can already make additions to the 
Build-POM as it will only be used by Maven (
+and of course IDEs).
+Therefore, with Maven 4, a new Model version 4.1.0 is introduced.
+This version introduces some new elements and attributes, while others are 
marked as deprecated.
+To not break the ecosystem, this version is only available for the Build-POM, 
while the Consumer-POM will still use
+version 4.0.0.
+This means Maven will generate the Consumer-POM during the build.
+
+**Note**: Maven 4 will of course continue to build your model version 4.0.0 
project!
+There is no need to update your POMs to 4.1.0 as long as you don't want to 
make use of the new features.
+But as with every software update - it's suggested to update them to 4.1.0, 
e.g., to avoid problems when deprecated
+features are removed in future updates.
+
+### Modules are now subprojects
+
+From the early days of Maven 1 until today, all build information is stored in 
the POM, short for "Project Object
+Model".
+Together with build folders and other files, the wording "Maven project" is 
used.
+However, for projects containing multiple parts, e.g., an API and a client, 
each of those parts was called a "module"
+and listed in the `<modules>` section of the POM, leading to the terms 
"multi-module project".
+This wording introduced some inconsistency, especially as projects without any 
`<modules>` section are often called "
+single-module".
+Since the introduction of the [Java Platform Module System][3] in Java 9, the 
term "module" has raised additional
+confusion.
+
+Maven 4 gets rid of this by naming "modules" as what they are - subprojects.
+Model version 4.1.0 contains a new element `<subprojects>` analogous to the 
now deprecated, but still usable, element
+`<modules>`.
+
+**Note**: It's suggested to use the terms `multi-project setup` and 
`single-project setup` to differentiate between a
+Maven project with or without subprojects.
+
+### New packaging type: bom
+
+Maven 4 introduces a dedicated packaging type to provide a [Bill of Material 
BOM][4] called "bom" to differentiate more
+precisely between "parent POMs" and dependency-managing BOMs.
+While the new type is only available with Model Version 4.1.0, the final 
outcome is a full Maven 3 compatible (model
+4.0.0) POM file!
+For an example, see the link above or
+the [live coding by Maven maintainer Karl Heinz Marbaise at IntelliJ IDEA Conf 
2024][5].
+
+**Note**: With Maven 4, it's also possible to exclude dependencies that are 
declared by BOMs using the existing
+`<exclusions>` element.
+Also note that in Maven 4, importing BOMs with a classifier is now possible.
+Therefore, the Maven team suggests that project BOMs should be generated as 
classified artifacts, using the
+`<bomClassifier>` element.
+This means that an imported BOM must **not** come from the same reactor as the 
current build but be available outside
+the project before the build (in other words, "you should import only external 
BOMs") or it may break your build (as
+shown in [MNG-8009][32]).
+That's why Maven 4.0 will show a warning if a BOM comes from the same reactor.
+In the future, this will most probably be changed to make the build fail.
+
+### Comparing Build-POM and Consumer-POM
+
+The following table shows a rough comparison of which content is available in 
which POM type when using Maven 4.
+
+**Notes**:
+
+* The column "Consumer-POM" obviously does not apply to artifacts that are of 
type "pom"!
+* Some of the build-related content which is (as of now) still available in 
the Consumer-POM might be available only in
+  the Build-POM in the future.
+
+| Content                                    | Build-POM | Consumer-POM |
+|:-------------------------------------------|:---------:|:------------:|
+| Model version                              |   4.1.0   |    4.0.0     |
+| 3rd party dependency information           |     ✅     |      ✅       |
+| Properties                                 |     ✅     |      ❌       |
+| Plugin configuration                       |     ✅     |      ❌       |
+| Repository information                     |     ✅     |      ✅       |
+| Project information / environment settings |     ✅     |      ✅       |
+| Deployment to remote repository            |     ✅     |      ✅       |
+
+**Warning**: There are rare situations where Maven 4 might produce a 
Consumer-POM based on version 4.1.0, e.g., when
+condition-based profiles (see below) can't be transformed to version 4.0.0.
+Maven will show a warning in such situations.
+
+### Declaring the root directory and directory variables
+
+Every time a Maven build is executed, it has to determine the project's root 
to identify things like the parent project,
+directory information, and so on.
+To "help" Maven find the root folder, you can create a `.mvn` folder in your 
root directory.
+This folder is intended to contain project-specific configuration to run 
Maven, e.g., a `maven.config` or `jvm.config`
+file, and therefore was also considered as the root folder.
+With Maven 4, there is a second option to clearly define the root folder.
+Model version 4.1.0, usable for the Build-POM, adds a boolean attribute called 
`root` in the `<project>` element.
+When this attribute is set to true (default is false), the directory of this 
POM file is considered the root directory.
+
+Another pain point in relation to the root directory is that until Maven 4, 
there was no official variable to make use
+of the root folder in your POM files, e.g., when you want to define the path 
to a `checkstyle-suppressions.xml` file for
+the checkstyle plugin.
+Maven 4 now provides official variables to reference the root directory in 
your POM configuration.
+The following table shows the official variables.
+
+| Variable                   |  Scope  | Definition                            
                                  | Always |
+|:---------------------------|:-------:|:------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------:|
+| `${project.rootDirectory}` | Project | `.mvn` folder or `root` attribute in 
pom                                |   No   |
+| `${session.topDirectory}`  | Session | Current directory or `--file` 
argument                                  |  Yes   |
+| `${session.rootDirectory}` | Session | `.mvn` folder or `root` attribute in 
pom for the `topDirectory` project |   No   |
+
+As you can see, these variables differentiate by their scope, where `project` 
is always related to the Maven project's
+definition (you could interpret this as the POM files) and `session` is the 
actual execution of a Maven build and is
+therefore related to the folder from where you start Maven.
+As a consequence of the definition, it's clear that the `rootDirectory` can 
only contain a value when either a `.mvn`
+folder is defined or the `root` attribute is set to true.
+However, if defined, it should always have the same value for a given project, 
whereas the value of the `topDirectory`
+variable can change depending on the execution point.
+
+Keep in mind that the root directory of the whole project (when considering 
multiple subprojects) is different from each
+subproject's own base directory, which was and is still accessible via the 
`${basedir}` property for use in POM
+files and will always have a value.
+
+**Note:** In the past, some people "hacked" workarounds for the 
`rootDirectory` variables, mostly by using internal
+variables.
+Starting with Maven 4, those "hacks" will most probably not work anymore 
because some of those variables were removed or
+at least marked as deprecated.
+See JIRA issue [MNG-7038][15] and the related [Pull Request for MNG-7038][16] 
for more information.
+
+### Alternate POM syntaxes
+
+While the syntax for the 4.0.0 Consumer-POM is set in stone for accessing the 
central repository, the Build-POM should
+be able to evolve.
+This includes allowing the use of alternate syntaxes by having Maven 4 provide 
a ModelParser SPI ([MNG-7836][24]),
+which can be implemented as a core extension and allow the usage of a 
different file as the POM and allow a custom
+syntax.
+
+One of the first projects that uses this feature is the [Apache Maven Hocon 
Extension][25].
+
+## Improvements for subprojects
+
+### Automatic versioning
+
+Maven 4 finally ships one of the oldest improvement requests - automatic 
parent versioning ([MNG-624][17], created in
+July 2005 and originally planned for Maven 2)!
+As expected, it's no longer required to define the parent versions in each 
subproject when using the new model version
+4.1.0.
+This is also extended to dependencies of project own subprojects and reduces 
the need to update POM files for new
+versions even more!
+
+The following code snippet shows the parent and dependency definition without 
the version tag.
+
+```xml
+
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.1.0"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
+  xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.1.0 
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.1.0.xsd";>
+  <modelVersion>4.1.0</modelVersion>
+
+  <parent>
+    <groupId>my.parents.groupId</groupId>
+    <artifactId>my.parents.artifactId</artifactId>
+  </parent>
+
+  <artifactId>myOwnSubprojectArtifactId</artifactId>
+
+  <dependencies>
+    <dependency>
+      <groupId>the.dependent.subproject.groupId</groupId>
+      <artifactId>the.dependent.subproject.artifactId</artifactId>
+    </dependency>
+  </dependencies>
+</project>
+```
+
+### Full support of CI-friendly variables
+
+Maven 3.5.0 introduced partial support for CI-friendly variables, e.g., 
`${revision}`, in your POM files.
+However, this still required the usage of the [Flatten Maven Plugin][20] for 
full functionality.
+Since Maven 4, no additional plugin is needed anymore; full built-in support 
is provided.
+You can now use variables as versions in your configuration, e.g.,
+
+```xml
+
+<groupId>my.groupId</groupId>
+<artifactId>my.artifactId</artifactId>
+<version>${revision}</version>
+```
+
+Of course, you have to provide a value for this variable when starting the 
build, for example by using a `maven.config`
+file or as a parameter, e.g., `mvn verify -Drevision=4.0.1`, which is commonly 
done in CI pipelines.
+
+Maven maintainer Karl Heinz Marbaise shows a larger example in
+his [article "Maven 4 - Part I - Easier Versions" (2024)][21].
+
+### Reactor improvements and fixes
+
+Building a project with multiple subprojects could cause trouble when one 
subproject was dependent on one of the
+others and its own build failed for whatever reason.
+Maven was telling the user to (fix the error and then) resume the build with
+`--resume-from :<nameOfTheFailingSubproject>`, which instantly fails the build 
again as the needed other subproject
+couldn't be found (as it was not rebuilt).
+Using `--also-make :<nameOfTheDependentSubproject>` was no help in the past as 
it was ignored due to the long-standing
+bug [MNG-6863][11] - which is finally fixed with Maven 4!
+
+**It is recommended not to use `mvn clean install`, but `mvn verify` for your 
regular builds!**
+
+To improve usability when resuming a failed build, you can now use `--resume` 
or its short parameter `-r` to resume a
+build from the subproject that last failed.
+So you don't have to manually pass the name of the failed subproject as the 
starting point to resume from.
+The reactor is now also aware of successfully built subprojects when the 
overall build failed and will skip rebuilding
+those if you resume the build.  
+With Maven 4, it's also aware of subfolder builds [MNG-6118][12], which 
becomes pretty handy when you only want to
+execute tools (e.g., Jetty) on/with certain subprojects, but not on every 
subproject.
+See Maven maintainer Maarten Mulders's article ["What's New in Maven 4" 
(2020)][13] for a small example.
+
+### Further improvements
+
+Further improvements to subprojects will also improve daily work with them.
+Thanks to [MNG-6754][14], all subprojects will now have consistent timestamps 
in their packaged archives, while in Maven
+3, each subproject had a different one.
+This should make it easier to identify the archives that belong together.
+When using Maven 3, deploying a project with multiple subprojects could end up 
in a situation where some (successfully
+built) subprojects were deployed to the (local or remote) repository, but 
failed subprojects were obviously not.
+This was finally changed in Maven 4 to the way most users expect:
+Only deploy when all subprojects are built successfully.
+
+## Workflow, lifecycle and runtime changes
+
+### Java 17 required to run Maven
+
+The required Java version to run Maven 4 will be Java 17.
+This not only allows Maven (and its maintainers) to make use of newer language 
features and improvements brought by the
+JDK but also comes with a more secure runtime as Java 17 includes more 
security features than earlier versions.
+
+**Important note**: Java 17 will only be needed to **run Maven**!
+You will still be able to compile against older Java versions using the same 
[compiler plugin configuration][6] as
+before!
+If this does not fit your requirements because you need to compile against or 
use another JDK, please look at
+the [Guide to Using Toolchains][7] (or the article [Introduction to Maven 
Toolchains][8] by Maven maintainer Maarten
+Mulders).
+
+*Side information: The ballot about the required Java version was held in 
March 2024, shortly before Java 22 was
+released. One reason Java 17 was chosen over Java 21 was that it was (at this 
time) the second-last Java version for
+which many vendors offer long-term support.*
+
+### Application maintenance
+
+As with every major update, extensive application maintenance has occurred, 
including significant code, API, and
+dependency updates and even removals.
+For example, the "Plexus Containers" dependency injection was removed - after 
being deprecated since Maven 3.2 (2010)!
+Code updates include not only the use of newer Java language features but also 
changes to make maintenance easier and
+less time-consuming.
+This also includes removing features that either should never have worked or 
were only kept for backward compatibility
+already in Maven 3, e.g., using `${pom.*}` expressions.
+Maven's own Super POM was also upgraded, which declares new default versions 
of Maven's core plugins.
+
+**Note**: Due to upgrading the default versions of Maven plugins, your build 
might behave differently than before, even
+if you didn't purposely change anything.
+To avoid this situation, you should always define fixed versions of all the 
plugins you use!
+By doing this, you are in control of your build - at the cost of being 
responsible for upgrading the versions yourself.
+Maven 4 will issue a warning if you rely on default versions defined in 
Maven's Super POM!
+
+### "Fail on severity" parameter
+
+Maven 4 introduces a "fail on severity" build parameter, which will break the 
build when at least one log message
+matches the given argument.
+
+The parameter can either be used by its full name (`--fail-on-severity`) or as 
a short handle (`-fos`).
+The parameter is followed by an argument specifying a log level severity, 
e.g., `WARN`.
+
+### Improvements to profiles
+
+Trying to use a nonexistent profile in a build causes the build to fail, as 
the following command line snippet shows:
+
+```
+> mvn compile -Pnonexistent
+[ERROR] The requested profiles [nonexistent] could not be activated or 
deactivated because they do not exist.
+```
+
+Maven 4 introduces the possibility to only use profiles when they exist.
+To do so, the `?` argument was added to the profile parameter.
+When using this, the build won't break; instead, an information message will 
be printed twice (at the start and end).
+See the following snippet for an example:
+
+```
+> mvn compile -P?nonexistent
+[INFO] The requested optional profiles [nonexistent] could not be activated or 
deactivated because they do not exist.
+[...]
+[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
+[INFO] 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+[INFO] Total time:  0.746 s
+[INFO] Finished at: 2024-12-14T13:24:15+01:00
+[INFO] 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+[INFO] The requested optional profiles [nonexistent] could not be activated or 
deactivated because they do not exist.
+```
+
+Maven 4 also introduces more flexible ways to activate profiles by providing 
condition-based activation.
+See [MNG-8286][27] for more information about supported functions.
+
+### Lifecycle changes
+
+#### Lifecycle changed from graph to tree
+
+Up to Maven 3, the lifecycle was an ordered list containing all phases.
+This changed with Maven 4, where the lifecycle is defined as a tree of phases.
+This allows for more consistent execution of dependent phases, e.g., `compile` 
must execute after `compile-only` project
+dependencies have reached the `ready` phase, and also allows "skipping" phases 
(in comparison to the old graph), e.g.,
+`deploy` an artifact without `install`ing it to the user repository.
+
+#### Pre- and post-phases, ordering of executions
+
+Every lifecycle phase now has a `before` and `after` phase, allowing plugins 
to bind themselves to those by adding their
+prefixes to the name of the main phase.
+For example, if you want to set up test data before running your integration 
tests, you could execute tasks during the
+`before-integration-test` phase.
+
+If this is not enough, perhaps because you want to do multiple things inside 
the same phase, you can order each
+execution inside a phase by using square brackets with an integer at the end 
of the phase name, e.g.,
+
+```
+before-integration-test[100]
+before-integration-test[200]
+```
+
+**Warning**: The conceptual `pre-*` and `post-*` phases, which were only 
available for selected phases and had
+inconsistent naming, are deprecated - don't use them!
+This becomes even more important if you were binding a plugin to the `post-*` 
phase of a lifecycle phase because the
+`pre-*` phase of the phase you really wanted to bind to did not exist, e.g., 
binding to `process-resources` phase
+because there was no `pre-compile` phase.
+
+## Maven plugins, security and tools
+
+### Maven plugins
+
+As mentioned above, Maven 4 contains significant code and API updates, 
resulting in breaking changes for (very) old
+Maven plugins that were not updated to use the recommended APIs.
+Major changes regarding plugins include a proper immutable plugin model 
together with a revised plugin API.
+The updated API provides hints as preparation for Maven 4.
+You can enable them by passing the following argument to your build: 
`-Dmaven.plugin.validation=verbose`.
+You should also only rely on the official Maven BOMs when developing plugins.
+If a plugin still relies on long-deprecated and now removed Plexus dependency 
resolution, it will no longer work.

Review Comment:
   Updated





> Information about "What's new in Maven 4?"
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNGSITE-550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-550
>             Project: Maven Project Web Site
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Matthias Bünger
>            Priority: Major
>
> A comprehensive article/list of the important changes in Maven 4 is needed.
> ----
>  
> Issue based on the slack message / thread, started by [~cstamas]
> {quote}
> More and more times we get questions like "and what is new in Maven4?". We 
> have no document that distills the relevant changes. Could someone try to 
> collect that in cwiki or somewhere?
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to