slawekjaranowski commented on code in PR #588:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/588#discussion_r1874731778


##########
content/markdown/developers/conventions/github.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+<!--
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+distributed with this work for additional information
+regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+"License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+"AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+specific language governing permissions and limitations
+under the License.
+-->
+# Maven GitHub Conventions
+
+This document describes how Maven developers and contributors should use 
GitHub Issues and Pull Request.
+
+## GitHub Issue, Pull Request - Recommendations.
+
+**Minor changes** such as code reformatting, documentation fixes, etc. that 
aren't going to impact other users
+can be committed without a GitHub Issue, but Pull Request is recommended.
+
+**Larger changes** such as bug fixes, API changes, significant refactoring, 
new classes, and pretty much any change
+of more than 100 lines, and **New feature** should have GitHub Issue in order 
to first discus planed change.
+
+GitHub Issue should be referenced in commit message by `#issue-number`.
+
+GitHub Issue and Pull Request should have a label with type, like `bug`, 
`enhancement` and so on.
+Pull Request without labels will be not categorized in Release Notes.
+
+Closed GitHub Issue and Pull Request should have milestone in which was 
resolved.
+
+Pull Request title is used to generate Release Notes - should be similar or 
the same as merged commit.
+
+Simply we should always provide changes by Pull Request. Direct commits will 
be not visible in Release Notes.
+
+## Release Notes
+
+Only Pull Request wits status **Merged** will be visible in Release Notes.
+
+We use GitHub Release Notes.
+
+We use the [Release Drafter 
Action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/release-drafter)
+for automatically preparing Release Notes.
+
+Default labels configurations are in 
[maven-gh-actions-shared](https://github.com/apache/maven-gh-actions-shared/blob/main/.github/release-drafter.yml)
 project.
+
+## How To Use Issue and Pull Request Details?
+
+### Assignee
+
+Committers can assign an GitHub Issue, Pull Request to a specific committer 
that person seems 
+to be well-placed to address it.
+
+Merged Pull Request should be assigned to committer who merge it.
+
+### Reviewers
+
+We should invite persons to review for every change, even it is simply one, 
review can increase code quality.
+
+### Priority
+
+For priority, we can use labels:

Review Comment:
   we have such in Jira ... I think that can be useful to have a priority or 
importance for issues



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to